To torture or not

Professor Shane O'Mara of Trinity College, Dublin, said the interrogation techniques had a detrimental effect on brain functions related to memory.

To torture or not

We Accept For For security reasons we do not store any credit card information. All payments are processed by PayPal. To Torture or Not to Torture Note: In order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read the Group Discussion Board Forum 2 Instructions and the following chapters from Holmes: If you have not done so, please stop and read that material.

Remember your initial thread must be a minimum of words: Select the To torture or not you think is the appropriate one to take in this case and explain why. For your reply, locate a member of your group with whom you disagree and tell them why you disagree with them with at least words.

The disagreement could be over which view they took or their understanding of the other views. Any quotes from sources must be cited and will not count towards your word count.

To Torture or Not to Torture | Premium Essay Writings

Your thread and reply are both due by Written By a Student named Michael Weidler From our reading in Holmes text we can pick four theories to explain the torture or not to torture discussion. The Kantian Duty-based ethics view on this is much more moral. This view would say that the ends do not always justify the means.

Every person is deserving of being treated humanely. The next theory, virtue ethics, could possibly advocate the use of torture if there was no other way to obtain the information from the individual and it was absolutely necessary.

From a Christian point of view, it is hard to advocate any form of torture. The only violence not condemned in the bible is fighting for your country or self-defense.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Torture is kind of in a unique spot if it is used for fighting for your country. On one hand you have potentially millions of lives depending on information the individual is withholding, so torture would seem justified. On the other hand, we should always place our faith in God and trust him to work things out.

The other issue that comes up is what defines torture. A few years ago there was controversy over whether waterboarding was considered torture.

Blog Archive

Military officers were waterboarding known terrorists in order to gain information and when it became public, the media began reporting it as torture. Through a Christian perspective I believe that waterboarding is not torture as it leaves no physical damage and really only places the individual in extreme discomfort.

Our own special forces go through waterboarding as part of their training. For other cases of obvious torture, such as the types used in medieval times, I believe that it is wrong in any situation.In this regard, torture can take a form of physical form or mental as well as emotional form.

Torture is a painful experience on the side of the person to whom the torture is done.

To torture or not

The main goal is to force a person to confess and produce some vital information%(32). "US policy is not to torture – and we do not," Perino told reporters. Bush has reiterated that claim during press briefings. “We do not torture,” he has said.

DoJ spokesman Brian Roehrkasse issued a statement saying the December memo remains binding on the executive branch. A signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture, the United States "does not torture." [1] Yet abundant evidence indicates that it does, directly or by proxy—and in fact always has.

An old American tradition of state-sponsored torture even has its own lexicon: SOA, Kubark, Phoenix, MK-Ultra. Sep 17,  · The larger issue with Bush’s use of torture isn’t torture per se, but the possibility that many of the people we have tortured are innocent of any charge.

That’s my real problem with Gitmo. All the administration has to do is claim that a suspect is a terrorist, and they can do as they please. To Torture Or Not To Torture Phil Torture is Justifiable The limited use of torture should be permitted in the US in order to protect the wellbeing of the public.

Torture can be both an effective means of gathering information, and it can be reasonably justified in some circumstances. Some of these circumstances can be any time where there is a . To Torture or Not to Torture From my reading and understanding of Holmes’ chapters and 14, I will try in my own words to explain each of the theories that were mentioned in the two questions for this discussion board%(7).

To torture, or not to torture? | US & Canada | Al Jazeera