A discussion on moral reasoning

Kant pursues this project through the first two chapters of the Groundwork. The point of this first project is to come up with a precise statement of the principle or principles on which all of our ordinary moral judgments are based. The judgments in question are supposed to be those that any normal, sane, adult human being would accept on due rational reflection. Nowadays, however, many would regard Kant as being overly optimistic about the depth and extent of moral agreement.

A discussion on moral reasoning

The colony ship Avalon is on its way to a distant star and the planet "Homestead II," with a crew of a couple hundred and passenger colonists. The passage will take years, all on board are in hibernation, and the ship is under the automatic control of its computers.

A discussion on moral reasoning

Thirty years into the voyage, the ship passes through an unrealistically dense field of asteroids and its defenses are overwhelmed. The ship is holed by a meteorite, which inflicts serious damage on its operating system.

However, the computers are programmed with the assumption that the ship is invulerable to such impacts. The diagnostics are unable to recognize the damage, which sets off a slow cascade of malfunctions, which soon take down the diagnostic system itself.

Meanwhile, the first sign of trouble is that one of the hibernation pods wakes up its sleeper, just as though the end of the voyage were approaching. This sleeper is helpfully a mechanical engineer, Jim Preston played by Chris Pratt.

The computers have also been programmed with the assumption that the hiberation pods cannot malfunction, which leaves Preston ignorant of what has really happened or what can be done about it.

Wandering the ship alone, his only companion turns out to be a robot bartender, "Arthur" Michael Sheenwho also initially denies that a pod can malfunction or that anything can be wrong.

Preston descovers that he cannot awaken any of the crew and cannot access the command decks or operating system of the ship.

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

For a year, he wanders about, slowly losing his sanity, falling into the habits of a naked hermit, aware that no one else will be A discussion on moral reasoning for 90 years.

Looking at her and able to review her application videos, he is soon infatuated. He is tempted to awaken her. This is our first dilemma.

Preston is clearly aware of the wrongfulness of waking her, and thus condemning her, with himself, to a long, miserable life and ultimate death on the Avalon.

On the other hand, he also feels that the only alternative is suicide.

A discussion on moral reasoning

This is a case where wrongful action leads, not to a greater good, but to something that is really only good for him -- which is generally the motive already for less outlandish kinds of wrongful action.

Nevertheless, he is driven to wake her up, leading her to think that she has been revived by the same kind of malfunction that awakened him.

Thus, her initial distress is no different than what was his at the comprable moment. After getting over that, she and Preston actually begin to enjoy each other, taking advantage of the enterainment features of the spaceship. They fall in love, and things become fairly hot and heavy.

However, "Arthur" then inadvertently divulges that she was not awakened by accident, but deliberately. Naturally, she is furious, comes close to killing Preston, and then shuns his presence. Meanwhile, more things begin to go wrong with the ship, a process that seems improbably protracted given the nature of the damage, about which they of course do not yet know.

However, a crew member is finally then awakened, played by Laurence Fishburne, of The Matrix fame.

Moral Development & Gender

Unfortunately, his hibernation pod has harmed him the course of his awakening, and he soon falls into a fatal decline. At least he is able to pass on his command authorizations, so Preston and Lane have a chance to discover and repair the damage.

The two of them are thus thrown together by necessity, and Fishburne, who knows what Preston has done, recommends some sympathetic understanding to Lane. After desperate, melodramatic, and perhaps improbable adventures, Preston and Lane are able to discover and repair the damage to the ship, which neither of them would have been able to do alone.

Thus we arrive at the final dilemma of the story. Preston discovers that he can put Lane back into hibernation using the diagnostic pod in the medical bay. There is only one of these, so only one them can take advantage of it.

Lane must then decide whether to use this and continue with her former plans, which were to witness the colonization effort and then return to Earth, after years, to report on it, or to stay with Preston and live out a life on the Avalon.

She chooses to stay. At the end of the movie, all the crew and passengers awaken normally, to find that the couple, long gone, made a life for themselves on the ship. Previews often do that, but it is usually the sign of a bad movie. Feeling deceived in this respect, reviewers then dismissed the end of the movie as an example of the "Stockholm Syndrome," whereby kidnap victims or hostages are deluded into identifying with their kidnappers.

However, Aurora Lane is not a kidnap victim, and she falls in love with Jim Preston with the understanding that the two of them are in the same circumstances for the same reasons. When she learns better, her choices are limited by their very presence on the ship.Also see SEP, EB, and M. Y.

Chew.. metanarrative. Stories employed to legitimate the mechanisms of social control. Thus, for example, when parents tell their children, "We only want to help you avoid our mistakes," they are constructing a metanarrative that justifies the imposition of rules of conduct they are unwilling to follow themselves.

This study investigated the effects of culture and collaborative discussion on Chinese and American children's moral reasoning in reflective essays that they composed about a moral and practical dilemma. Talk:Moral reasoning and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.

In both of their pages moral reasoning is heavily discussed. Spelling and grammar seem fine. I don't think there is much else that you could include in this page without overlapping other pages. The moral discussion literature seems generally to include contradictory con- clusions about whether exposure to reasoning one stage .

Moral reasoning is a thinking process with the objective of determining whether an idea is right or wrong. To know whether something is "right" or "wrong" one must first know what that something is intended to accomplish. Thus, to know if "this direction" is the right direction to follow to get to a.

Ethics and Moral Reasoning: A Student's Guide (Reclaiming the Christian Intellectual Tradition) [C. Ben Mitchell, David S. Dockery] on benjaminpohle.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. From drone warfare to gay marriage, the modern world is full of ethical conundrums stemming from a plethora of amazing technological advances and dramatic cultural shifts.

Moral Development | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy